13 IN MACBOOK PRO DIMENSIONS 2010 FULL
13 IN MACBOOK PRO DIMENSIONS 2010 WINDOWS

The MacBook Pro's stereo speakers were more than loud enough when we played The White Stripes over Pandora. We wish that Apple offered an antiglare display as it does on the 17-inch MacBook Pro.

13 IN MACBOOK PRO DIMENSIONS 2010 FULL

Unfortunately, when we watched an episode of 30 Rock at full screen through Hulu, the glossy finish limited our viewing angles from the sides, as well as from the front with the lid dipped forward. Colors looked vibrant, and blacks appeared as rich shadows.

The 13.3-inch (1280 x 800) LED-backlit display is plenty bright. A new feature keeps scrolling pages for a bit even after you've completed the finger swipe this makes it easier to move though large documents. When we used two fingers to zoom in and out of pages in Safari 4, the on-screen response was very quick and smooth.

13 IN MACBOOK PRO DIMENSIONS 2010 WINDOWS

By pushing four fingers toward the top of the touchpad, we were able to fling windows up toward the top of the screen, exposing a clean desktop. The friction is slight, and we were able to effortlessly press down on the button without thinking about the fact that there's no dedicated touch button (nevermind two).Īlso, multitouch gestures work smoothly. The touchpad remains one giant button that doubles as the touchpad and the mouse button, and is the best in the business. It's also backlit with an ambient light sensor, which comes in handy for low-light environments. While the keyboard on, say, the 17-inch MacBook Pro might be too large (and too recessed) for some hands, the 13-inch version's keyboard is comfortably placed. That monitor is effectively 2 displays and the 13' MBP is driving it as best as it is capable of.As always, the keyboard on the 13-inch MacBook Pro has a soft finish, and makes little sound when you type. So it's no small wonder the 16' MBP can handle that monitor.

See the difference? The 13' can drive 2 external displays at a reduced resolution while the 16' can drive 2 displays at 6k each. *In addition to simultaneous support of the internal display, this model supports a maximum resolution up to 6016x3384 at 60 Hz at over a billion colors on up to two external displays or up to 4096x2304 resolution at 60 Hz at over a billion colors on up to four external displays via Thunderbolt 3 (USB-C). *In addition to simultaneous support of the internal display, this model supports a single external display up to 5120x2880 at 60Hz at over a billion color, up to two displays up to 4096x2304 at 60Hz at millions of colors, or up to two displays up to 3840x2160 at 60Hz at over a billion colors via Thunderbolt 3 (USB-C). Here's what EveryMac has to say about the 13' 2019 MBP: They aren't supposed to help you, but point out that this isn't an isolated problem. Have anyone else had luck with this? Any suggestions? I have confirmed both by plugging it in and using the same cable I use on my 13'' Macbook Pro 2019.ĭoes anyone know if this is achievable and/or possible? Is Apple's spec sheet lying about its capabilities? I've tried those override apps for selecting custom resolutions and all that does is scale to the resolution and makes everything look horrible. The monitor can achieve its full resolution with no issues on a Macbook Pro 16'' and a windows machine. I am unable to achieve anywhere near that and max out at 3840 x 1080. I don't get an option for its native resolution of 5120 x 1440.Īpple's website states that the 2019 Macbook Pro 13'' can achieve one display with 5120‑by‑2880 resolution at 60Hz.

My Macbook Pro can only get the display to 3840 x 1080. I am using the one and only cable that Apple sells on its own website by Moshi that is capable of 5K resolution. I've got a 2019 Macbook Pro 13'' and have it plugged into a 49' CRG9 Dual QHD Curved QLED Gaming Monitor (model number LC49RG90SSNXZA).

13 in macbook pro dimensions 2010